Entradista

I'm Ian Betteridge, and I do content and talk endlessly about technology.

Moodagent - a great tool for playlists

Once you start to have thousands of songs on your iPod or iPhone, if you’re anything like me you tend to find that you listen to the same few songs over and over again. It’s almost like you’re paralysed by having too much choice.

Apple’s Genius mixes are one way around this, but they tend to be rather one-dimensional. Because they work principally on the basis of genre, they can sometimes bounce between up-tempo and slow, dark songs with sweetness and light.

Moodagent (iTunes Link) is a method of creating lists of songs which match your mood. The way it works is simple: it analyses your library, matching each track against an online database of “moods”. This can take a few minutes if you have lots of songs – around ten minutes for the 3,000 or so songs on my iPhone.

You then express what “mood” you’re in by playing around with five sliders, representing five mood aspects: Sensual, Tender, Joy, Aggressive and Tempo.

The app then creates a playlist of 25 songs which match that mood. When I tested it, it produced some really good quality playlists, which managed to mix up different genres while retaining a definite theme amongst the songs.

There’s one drawback, though. Although Moodagent plays songs using the iPhone’s built-in player, it can’t (yet) save the playlists you create back to iTunes. You can, however, save the playlists within Moodagent, so your carefully-crafted list can always be retrieved.

Moodagent is free, and at that price who could argue? But if it actually cost a couple of pounds, I’d still thing it was worth it.

(Image by Parislemon)

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Pheer me. via farm3.static.flickr.com
Kingdom Of Style: Drip

Richard Stallman on The Setup

Got to agree with John Gruber: Whatever you think of Stallman, he walks the walk.

Go see this at Tate Modern.

Go see this at Tate Modern.

Tablet? Remember Bill Gates’ Haiku?
I do. Haiku (I think) became UMPC, which wasn’t good enough because the screens were all resistive rather than capacitive, which meant they were horrid and cludgy. And there was no software which really took advantage of touch, and no one developed any because, well, it was just Windows. Another missed opportunity from Microsoft.

Tablet? Remember Bill Gates’ Haiku?

I do. Haiku (I think) became UMPC, which wasn’t good enough because the screens were all resistive rather than capacitive, which meant they were horrid and cludgy. And there was no software which really took advantage of touch, and no one developed any because, well, it was just Windows. Another missed opportunity from Microsoft.

There’s some kind of weird shirt action going on to the right there. Via 1000heads: The Word of Mouth People  » Tuttle hits 1000heads…

There’s some kind of weird shirt action going on to the right there. Via 1000heads: The Word of Mouth People  » Tuttle hits 1000heads…

[Flash 10 is required to watch video]

Maximum cat.

Programme producers - i.e. the people who make the content, the performers, musicians, writers, etc. - are understandably worried that digital technology makes it trivially easy to access and distribute their work - often without any payment. This situation presents real problems for them. Good quality television programmes are expensive to make and, even where producers are well paid by the broadcaster who commissions their programmes, they are often dependent on sales of this content in secondary markets (DVD and Blu-ray sales, repeat showings on other channels, and overseas sales) to cover the costs of production (and hopefully make a profit).

BBC - BBC Internet Blog: Freeview HD content management

When will they fucking learn? DRM is not a solution.

Day in and day out, the electronics industry manipulates us. They publish “speeds and feeds” in big bold type—measurements that turn out to mean almost nothing. It’s all just misdirection.

—Amen, David Pogue