Entradista

I'm Ian, and I do content.

Multiculturalism and Its Discontents | Big Questions Online

I am an atheist with an affinity for non-fundamentalist religious believers whose faith has made room for secular knowledge. I am also a political liberal. I am not, however, a multiculturalist who believes that all cultures and religions are equally worthy of respect. And I find myself in a lonely place in relation to many liberals, political and religious, because I cannot accept a multiculturalism that tends to excuse, under the rubric of “tolerance,” religious and cultural practices that violate…

(via Instapaper)

There is no escape from Solutions Cat

There is no escape from Solutions Cat

Yet another Mexican food place opens near work. Are they all trying to tempt me?

Yet another Mexican food place opens near work. Are they all trying to tempt me?

Must say I am enjoying the Pronouncements of Chairman Schmidt, we have been following them ever since the Repeal of Privacy: “if you have something that you don’t want anyone to know, maybe you shouldn’t be doing it in the first place” ……last year.
This is of course the same Google that refused to speak to CNET journalists for months after they published stuff about Schmidt - obtained from Google searches. And then there was the contretemps about a certain lady.

I have seen the Singularity, and it is run by Google - broadstuff

In some senses, I think Schmidt is right: We’re heading towards a post-privacy world. One of the pieces of thinking that has most-influenced me on this lately came from an unexpected source: “The Light of Other Days” by Stephen Baxter and Arthur C Clarke.

The book features a technology which uses wormholes in spacetime to effectively “remote view” anything, anywhere (and ultimately, any time). What it does, though, is nicely examine the social and cultural implications of this: what happens when you can be certain that you’re being watched, all the time?

Clarke and Baxter take the positive view: We stop caring what anyone thinks, and enjoy ourselves. The key thing, of course, is that everyone can watch, not just the state – so there’s a different cultural conclusion compared to Orwell’s Big Brother, where it’s the state that does the watching.

My new agenda for blogging

Why did I decide to shutter my old blog? Although I touched on this in my final post there, I think it’s worth exploring a little more. 

What I found was that I’d become trapped in the reactive, provocative mode of writing. It’s what I think of as the “news agenda” method: You write about what’s happening now, leveraging your experience and perspective to grab attention.

I was writing with perspective – it’s hard not to write with perspective – but not with any particular knowledge or insight born of actual on the ground experience. 

And the funny thing was that it felt slightly corrosive. It is a bit like a circus, with a thousand clowns and jugglers all performing at the same time, trying to grab the audience’s attention, and no ringmaster to keep everyone in line. The temptation to shout louder, to be meaner, to be more provocative for the sake of it was the bit that was inevitably corrosive. Who really wants to perform in a circus like that?

It was, in fact, corrosive not just in a human sense - but also corrosive of my interest in technology. I’ve never been a classic technology person: my background is in the humanities, in philosophy. What I’m really interested in with regard to technology is the myriad ways that human beings use it to make their lives better, whether that’s a brilliant new engine which will take you from New York to San Francisco on a single tank of petrol, a new kind of seed that resists a previously-endemic pest, or a sublimely beautiful piece of software. 

And that interest extends well beyond the most common type of writing about technology, which focuses on that great late-20th Century thing, the computer. There’s more to technology than that. A new industrial process, a new method of weaving that lets you make more beautiful clothes… all of those are technology too. Yet if you read “the technology sites”, you’d never know it. 

You’d think that technology was Google, and Apple, and Microsoft… the web, and devices. And that would be it.

When you find yourself writing the umpteenth article about why product X is better than product Y, or why company Y’s patents are crazy, you find yourself questioning what you’re doing it for.

I’m lucky, in that writing about technology isn’t my day job: that, these days, involves creating content strategies for brands to help them communicate to their customers. So when I write about technology, or anything else, it should be for fun.

So, I decided to shutter the old blog and do something new. The way that I’m approaching writing now is that I’m only going to write about things that are more directly involved in my experience. No commentary on what anyone else is doing: Just commentary on what *I’m* doing, and one what I know from doing. Sometimes, that will involve writing about tech, because tech is still part of my life (like it is everyone’s). But it could equally involve design, fashion, the pros and cons of feeding cats dry food, or coffee.

With technology writing in particular, I now have one aim: Use my experience of technology to help other people who may have the same interests. So, for example, I might write something on my experience of using Android for the first time as an iPhone user, because some people might find some of the stuff in that useful. But what I won’t write is a “my platform is TEH FUUUTURE” piece, because… well, what’s the point? How does that help anyone? What does it do except play the page views game?

My only advice to anyone about writing is simple: Write about what you care about. Write about what matters in your life. Never, ever, fake it - if you’re not passionate about something, if something doesn’t really matter, don’t write about it.

Microsoft would be better off ignoring Windows 7 and instead starting with elements of the xBox and Zune architectures. They have a UI, design foot print, and use case, that is far more applicable to the slate. Who knows. Maybe Microsoft is right. Maybe people really do want to run Windows, Office, and other applications on a slate…and they really do want to print stuff. Time will tell.